Member-only story

Sorry Democrats, your party has racial bias problems too (Part 1)

Kent Kroeger
10 min readMay 17, 2018

--

By Kent R. Kroeger (May 16, 2018)

[This is Part 1 of a two-part article on how racial/ethnic attitudes permeated the 2016 election. Part 1 details the issues and complexities of efforts to understand racial attitudes and how they impact the political arena. Part 2 details my own research on this topic with respect to the 2016 presidential election.]

‘Racism’ is an ugly word. And to call someone a ‘racist’ is too often a predatory act meant to silence someone’s voice rather than to bring enlightenment to a debate.

The terms ‘racism’ and ‘racist’ remain a significant subject of inquiry in the social science community, in part, because these words invoke strong feelings within people even as their definitions are still contested.

What does it mean to be a ‘racist’?

The Merriam-Webster dictionary’s definitions of ‘racism’ are the following:

Merriam-Webster is smart to cover as many bases as possible with its definitions of ‘racism’ as the sociological utility of the term is not settled science. During my 30 years of measuring public opinion, I…

--

--

Kent Kroeger
Kent Kroeger

Written by Kent Kroeger

I am a survey and statistical consultant with over 30 -years experience measuring and analyzing public opinion (You can contact me at: kroeger98@yahoo.com)

No responses yet